The podcast episode is titled ‘Attending to the Backside of It’: The pandemic’s have an effect on on upper training.
As any individual who asks questions for a dwelling, I used to be massively inspired via Alec’s questions.
Alec is calling the correct questions on upper training after COVID-19. His questions are a excellent reminder to all folks to make certain that scholars have a seat on the desk as we work out what comes subsequent.
Listed here are Alec’s questions. How would you resolution them?
Q1. Do you imagine we’re at a turning level in upper training so far as how the choices made at this second will affect the training atmosphere no longer simply post-COVID, however for years down the road?
Q2. What do you are expecting the post-COVID instructional panorama to realistically appear to be on a daily foundation for a faculty like GW and what are some elements to believe?
Q3. Do you imagine strategies like changing the instructional calendar or opening up digital choices for positive categories would possibly result in any roughly enrollment expansion? That appears to be a big factor so far as making up for this funds shortfall and dealing to carry extra scholars into the fold.
This fall. How do college and body of workers play into this? Clearly, they make up a big a part of this new instructional activity pressure, but when their issues aren’t then translated into college motion it would result in issues. So first, how essential are college to serving to design this post-COVID atmosphere and the way significantly must the college weigh their enter?
Q5. I believe it’s additionally essential to say the inequities in upper training that COVID-19 exacerbated to a point, which I do know is one thing you two have mentioned as smartly. So how can this post-COVID instructional panorama take one of the issues we’ve realized on this digital atmosphere and use that to beef up fairness transferring ahead?