Tommy Robinson loses libel case introduced by Syrian schoolboy


Tommy Robinson has misplaced a libel case introduced in opposition to him by a Syrian teenager who was filmed being attacked in school.

The founding father of the English Defence League – whose actual title is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – was sued by Jamal Hijazi, who was assaulted within the playground at Almondbury group college in Huddersfield in October 2018.

Shortly after the video of the incident went viral, Robinson claimed in two Fb movies that Jamal was “not harmless and he violently assaults younger English ladies in his college”.

Within the clips seen by practically 1 million individuals, Robinson, 38, additionally claimed Jamal “beat a lady black and blue” and “threatened to stab” one other boy at his college, allegations {the teenager} denies.

At a four-day trial in April, Jamal’s attorneys mentioned Robinson’s feedback had “a devastating impact” on the schoolboy and his household who had come to the UK as refugees from Homs, Syria.

Robinson, who represented himself, argued his feedback had been considerably true, claiming to have “uncovered dozens of accounts of aggressive, abusive and deceitful behaviour” by Jamal.

Nonetheless, in a judgment delivered on Thursday, Mr Justice Nicklin dominated in Jamal’s favour and granted him £100,000 in damages.

Catrin Evans QC, for Jamal, beforehand mentioned that Robinson’s feedback led to {the teenager} “dealing with dying threats and extremist agitation” and that he ought to obtain damages of between £150,000 and £190,000.

In the course of the trial, Evans described Robinson as “a well known extreme-right advocate” with an “anti-Muslim agenda” who used social media to unfold his views.

She added that Robinson’s movies “turned Jamal into the aggressor and the bully right into a righteous white knight”.

Nonetheless, Robinson maintained he was an impartial journalist in the course of the trial, telling the courtroom: “The media merely had zero curiosity within the different aspect of this story, the uncomfortable reality.”

A listening to will comply with Thursday’s judgment to think about the implications of the ruling.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *